Monday, September 17, 2012

e1868 RE:RE:RE:史上最大的可怕迷信

2002/6/26 上午 12:31:09

>>新約裏獨生子、兒子、長子有特別的含義。
>>獨生子只有用在耶穌身上,表明獨特性;
>>兒子和長子表明既有的繼承權;
>>兒子也表明身份或與神的關係。
>
>Jesus was not God, ...

約 翰 福 音 
1:1 太 初 有 道 、 道 與   神 同 在 、 道 就 是   神 。 
1:14 道 成 了 肉 身 、 住 在 我 們 中 間 、 充 充 滿 滿 的 有 恩 典 有 真 理 。 我 們 也 見 過 他 的 榮 光 、 正 是 父 獨 生 子 的 榮 光 。 
8:58 耶 穌 說 、 我 實 實 在 在 的 告 訴 你 們 、 還 沒 有 亞 伯 拉 罕 、 就 有 了 我 。 


> ... even though the word of John 10:30, "I and my Father are one, He that has the Father has Me," might suggest so. Although the declaration "are one" is recognized to be a claim to deity by various religious authorities, the Greek word for "one" (hen) is neuter; therefore, what was meant is not unity of person, but unity of Essence. The Son is of one Substance with the Father--that is, Jesus had received the Divine Love. 
>
>Trinitarians assert that Jesus claimed to be God when they quote him in John 14:9, "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father." And they compound that assertion with the words of John 3:16, allegedly stating that believing on Jesus suffices as being equal to believing on the Father, "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have Everlasting Life." But in John 12:44-49 Jesus emphatically states that believing on him really means believing on the Father, and that he is not himself the Father, "Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on Him that sent me. And he that seeth me, seeth Him that sent me." (...) For I have not spoken on My own authority; but the Father who sent Me gave Me a command, what I should say and what I should speak. 

a. 約 翰 福 音 
12:43 這 是 因 他 們 愛 人 的 榮 耀 、 過 於 愛   神 的 榮 耀 。 
12:44 耶 穌 大 聲 說 、 信 我 的 、 不 是 信 我 、 乃 是 信 那 差 我 來 的 。 

b. Jesus is not himself the Father, but the Son.
Jesus is God as the same as the Father is God.



No comments:

Post a Comment