2002/7/8 下午 05:29:29
>In my humble opinion, the reason for which Jesus replied to the man is not that he admit he was good, but that he was THE ONLY person that man was talking to. To reply to the man does not absolutely mean Jesus took the title containing "good." ...
Jesus' reply can be understood this way.
>... Besides, if we look into the Old Testament, we may find in the Genesis that many things God Created are called good. Therefore, "why do you call me good" and "Only God is good" are not correct statements. Also note that in the Gospel according to Luke, there is a man called "Good Samaritan."
God's creation WAS good, but later it changed since Genesis Three.
It is "a certain Samaritan" without "good" in Luke 10.
路 10:33 惟 有 一 個 撒 瑪 利 亞 人 、 行 路 來 到 那 裡 ． 看 見 他 就 動 了 慈 心 、
Anyway, Jesus wants people to ponder thatgood" means.
>>Who knows that Jesus be part of the Holy Trinity?
>>Even Jesus did not reveal trinity clearly.
>
>So I wonder why Jesus would not reveal such an important matter when he was on earth.
The important matter is revealed in the Bible: why a man should be saved by Jesus'blood, instead of what EACTLY God is, or how EXACTLY God is composed.
>In my humble opinion, the reason for which Jesus replied to the man is not that he admit he was good, but that he was THE ONLY person that man was talking to. To reply to the man does not absolutely mean Jesus took the title containing "good." ...
Jesus' reply can be understood this way.
>... Besides, if we look into the Old Testament, we may find in the Genesis that many things God Created are called good. Therefore, "why do you call me good" and "Only God is good" are not correct statements. Also note that in the Gospel according to Luke, there is a man called "Good Samaritan."
God's creation WAS good, but later it changed since Genesis Three.
It is "a certain Samaritan" without "good" in Luke 10.
路 10:33 惟 有 一 個 撒 瑪 利 亞 人 、 行 路 來 到 那 裡 ． 看 見 他 就 動 了 慈 心 、
Anyway, Jesus wants people to ponder thatgood" means.
>>Who knows that Jesus be part of the Holy Trinity?
>>Even Jesus did not reveal trinity clearly.
>
>So I wonder why Jesus would not reveal such an important matter when he was on earth.
The important matter is revealed in the Bible: why a man should be saved by Jesus'blood, instead of what EACTLY God is, or how EXACTLY God is composed.
No comments:
Post a Comment