Monday, September 17, 2012

e1985 RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:#1937

2002/7/6 下午 02:12:37

>I agree with that. A rhetorical question also arouses in the reader some feeling of doubt. Very often the asker of the question will provide the answer, as in the case of Mark 10:18.
>
>Doesn't that prove Jesus denies his godship? Of course you disagree with that.

The denial is possible but in a low possibility and reasonability.
(If God only is good, no master is good, and then Jesus is disqualified to answer the question because he is just a master.)
(If Jesus is not God, John One (1:1-3, 14) should be wrong to present Jesus as God.)
Anyway, the why-question is an insert to the conversation.
Jesus took the opportunity to have people think who he is and what God is,
but Jesus did not clarify who he is directly.

>Person A: Just Tutor, what should I, an applicant, do to pass the road test?
>Person B: Why do you call me just? No one is just-- except only the inspector of road test. Others could not tell you for sure what you should do.
>
>It is clear from the above that the Tutor is not the inspector. 
>Therefore Jesus is not God as described in Mark 10:18.

The exception is the tutor is the inspector himself.

>Likewise, if Jesus be part of the Holy Trinity, he would not have asked the question "why do you call me good?" and replied. This would have been REDUNDANT!

Who knows that Jesus be part of the Holy Trinity?
Even Jesus did not reveal trinity clearly.



No comments:

Post a Comment